Message from Diane for 25-September-2009 by Mike Quinsey

Gratitude and Thanks…much LOVE to ALL

Why are they always speaking of Obama or the US,what about the rest of the world?

Blessings of Joy and Abundance to all.

The messages are certainly becoming more refreshing and sit well, within me.

Has any one had problems with sleep patterns just before and after the Solar wave/Equinox activity, as i have. This morning, for the first time in several days i woke refreshed and contented. Any one else relate to this?

Namaste’

Laurinda, I guessed as much. I will ask the question at Starseeds and report back.

@Laurinda & Star Warrior
Yes, my sleep patterns has also been strange lately. It is not often I can relate to Karen’s report’s, but this time I can. She also mentions sleep problems: http://www.emergingearthangels.com/2009/wings9.22.2009.html

@Lyrae
The reason why these messages are addressed primarily to the US is not out of disrespect or lack of interest in the rest of the world, but as I see it, it is because that is where the most help is needed right now. It is also were the biggest changes will occur, and this have a ripple effect to the rest of the world.

Once e.g. the Federal Reserves money manipulations are revealed it will shock people across the world, but it will also make them think about their own “national” banks in their own countries – they will realize that they are just as corrupt. The same applies for politicians, and it is with great joy that I daily see one scandal after another – the old system is falling apart.

Obama is a lightworker – we do not have any politicians I know of like that here in Denmark – we only have the fearful greedy self-serving people who have manipulated their way into power, or have been put there.

The politicians in Denmark have not even given us the people a chance to vote on the EU treaty that will end all sovereignty and introduce a EU president who is not held accountable by the people (we do not vote who becomes president – the corrupt politicians do). Luckily Ireland is allowed to vote – and I hope they will say “NO” for the rest of Europe that have not been given a chance. They said no the last time, but see the powers that want to introduce this, will not take no for an answer, so they will have to vote again. There is no democracy – it is an illusion, but that is going to change!!!

In Light & Peace

@star warrior # 6
For weeks leading up to the equinox I have been awake every night around 2:00 -3:30 AM for no reason. It’s still continuing, but not as bad. I wake up because I “hear” something, but there is nothing outside (at least from what I can see.) I was un-nerved by it at first, but now just trying to go with it. I take the opportunit while I am awake to pray/communicate with my guardian angels and guides.

QuadHealer,

Thanks for your visionary answer, your absolutely right about the whole EU system, the Bilderberg Group is still very active in Europe.

You want to talk about UFOs? We can talk about UFOs. But you want to talk about CHANNELING UFOs? For a minute or two, sure.

I can’t make a whole lot of time for horseshit.

Here’s what I want to know: why can’t ufology eliminate, at least, the obviously silly? The stuff that makes rational people turn away from ufology muttering, “Get a clue!” Stuff like channeling, and people who tell stories about visits aboard UFOs in which the aliens act just like the ones the experiencer saw in movies when they were little; abduction experiences that are silly in their resemblance to bad science fiction movies. Billy Meier videos of “dinosaurs” and his photos of the pretty alien lady “Asket”. Or videos of airplanes and helicopter lights, of really, really obvious stunt kites. I mean, stuff that doesn’t even fool my kids — who laughed at an Ed Walters’ “UFO” video I was screening; howled at its silliness without any prompting from me. Why can’t we, at least, turn away from sheer silliness?

Sure, lots of ufologists ridicule Meier, for example, now, but some take him seriously and for a long time many more did. The German UFO magazine UFO-Kurier reports that a Meier photo of Asket, a pretty lady from “the Pleides”, was actually taken from a videotape of The Dean Martin Show! “Asket” was some woman dancing or singing on The Dean Martin Show — and she had an exotic face so Billy Hubcaps took a picture of the screen and said it was a blurry photo taken aboard a spaceship. UFO-Kurier shows both pictures for comparison. It’s her all right. But why did we have to go that far to prove anything? Show me a picture of a pretty lady with straight flaxen hair and a 70s look, a blurry background, tell me it was taken on a spaceship, and I’ll laugh, and I’ll say, “That’s silly.” I didn’t need the Kurier’s proof. (Maybe they’re just providing it for amusement). Meier was patently silly from the start.

I was briefly a member of MUFON. I my membership lapse because they would insist on booking charlatans who projected slides of Sumerian gods they passed off as “ancient astronauts,” and CHANNELERS who were in “contact” with “aliens,” for the MUFON lecture series. Listen to a channeler do his or her thing — just be a little objective, put aside the desire to believe-in-advance — and you shrivel from embarrassment, or you laugh…because it’s SILLY. These people are living, breathing Saturday Night Live sketches.

Channeling as a concept, even…Just give me one solid reason, just one, just one little tiny reason, a microscopically tiny reason, to believe in channelers. No channeler has ever obtained from their alien correspondents any scientifically testable information; no asteroids or comets they know about that we don’t, that they could point out; and certainly no landing sites to visit where they’ll be waiting (occasionally some were offered – but the aliens invariably failed to show up). Judging from the disparity between types of aliens described by the various channelers, there are apparently many, many races swarming round our planet. These aliens, we’re told, are REALLY CONCERNED for our well being, but they all uniformly refuse, evidently, to give us any really useful information — like the FUCKING CURE FOR CANCER for God’s sake. YES: How about a cure for cancer, you bandy legged eggheaded , greyblue, noseless little bastards? How about an antigravity formula? How about ONE SINGLE PIECE OF SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION, confirmable, that we don’t have? Nothing’s forthcoming. Hey, they don’t want to spoil us, right?

I’m a pretty good performer; been on stage as singer, put across many other media, and I know I could channel like a motherfucker. Just set me up at a MUFON meeting, I’ll go into a very believable looking trance, I’ll come up with a very believable alien-voice, which will spout comfortingly exotic platitudes. I could be cleaning up on this shit. All you need is imagination and some acting ability. And you need to be reasonably articulate…Um, come to think of it, slightly articulate will do.

It’s a self-starter’s industry, man. No overhead.

I’m ranting about this because there are a surprising number of people who still take saucer-channelers seriously — otherwise intelligent people like Michael Lindenmann who does the quite valuable CNI newsletter. The people at LA MUFON. The CSETI people…

No one seems to have learned anything from Heaven’s Gate.

And I put so-called “vectoring” and “remote sensing” in the same category. There do seem to have been some military intelligence experiments with “remote sensing.” Jimmy Carter says there was, and he’s almost the only politician I trust. (Hey, this guy has done more good in the world since being president than all of the presidents who’ve presided since then.) And in fact I happen to know that some psychic phenomena is real. It’s almost as rare as hen’s teeth; and if there are 1,000,000 psychics, 999,999 of them are liars or self-deluded — but it exists. And maybe there have been some more-than-lucky remote sensing hits in the military intelligence context. I doubt if any of the self-promoting remote sensors claiming to have been working for the government really did; and if they did I doubt they had any success. But they don’t have to have been successful; with the UFO field in its current state, they only have to SAY they were successful. That’s the wonderful thing about remote sensing — since it has a technical sound to it (like the even-more-questionable “reverse speech analysis”), and the apparent, hearsay validation of military intelligence involvement…man, that’s good enough for ufology. I have never seen one clear-cut piece of evidence (something that appears on a Web site is not a piece of evidence, it’s something that appears on a Web site) that any of the field’s notorious remote sensors participated in any kind of successful remote sensing program. I can’t count how many flying saucer experts and witnesses supposedly used to work for the CIA or Naval Intelligence — or something similar, so long as it confers spurious credibility. (Derrel Sims, for example. I can prove that I worked for the CIA — as much as Derrel Sims did. I didn’t — and neither did he.)

Documentation apparently isn’t necessary in the UFO field; not real documentation. We’ll believe anything as long as they tell a good story, the way Stephen Greer used to. But Greer’s losing it: Recently he “remotely sensed” that U.S. military forces attacked an “underground alien base”; nerve gas was involved; many casualties. All hushed up of course. Well, he used to tell a good story. But give it time and the best liar will start leaking at the seams. Underground alien bases…Lord…

Greer has failed to “remotely vector in” (psychically summon) any UFOs where anyone outside his cronies in CSETI can see them. He has failed to give us any videotaped evidence of the saucer visits he’s reported (there are a couple of ludicrous videos of small, fuzzy, distant lights moving about — airplanes, stars taped with wobbling cameras, etc.)…But of course, as in all such encounters, the saucers, I assume, reach out and blot out the cameras…or make the cameramen forget them. Greer, in his lectures, shows us photos of spacecraft in the sky, the familiar photos you can see in the usual UFO books — including some proven hoaxes; but we are to believe that cameras which evidently work for the people who took the pictures in his slide-show, won’t work for him, for some reason. Why don’t cameras work for Greer, in filming UFOs. when they supposedly work for others? What — don’t the aliens like the guy?

The lady who sees the Grey Dudes regularly appear in her bathroom — the lady with a book to sell — can’t, of course, set up a video cam to catch the little guy and his various weird alien pals who show up with him at times, because, naturally, the aliens emanate a field, or something, which blots those cameras, too. People all over the world have video cameras; people all over the world have face to face encounters with aliens and chupacabras and yet those particular people are always without their video cameras and their Nikons. Every damn time.

When UFOs are videotaped, it’s always in the far distance — though there are many reports of people seeing them up close. Somehow the people who see them up close never have video cameras or even Polaroid cameras with them (or it just happens to be a dark night). The UFOs only appear to people who have no video cameras, or are far away. But of course, naturally, the greys are psychically arranging all this. That particular Sheer Silliness — The Silly Excuse — is fundamental to Ufology Today.

There’s that new video from Mexico City — the one they showed on UPN in April. How about that? It comes to us via Jaime Maussan, the guy who gave us the Masters of the Stars video, along with the Elders, the people who used to tout Billy Meier, and it’s been clearly demonstrated that key saucer footage in Masters of the Stars is hoaxed. But giving the guy the benefit of the doubt anyway, we look at the new video, and it looks damned good, just like a special effect should. It’s so very obviously digital. Computer animation.

No, you can’t trust images of things flying about in the sky, not in 1998, if you ever could. Too easy to fake. But a close up of an alien, that might be a little more convincing…walking, talking, breathing. Not that shitty, fake looking one supposedly smuggled out of Area 51, that one doesn’t make it. Not the rubbery bodies repudiated by special effects experts in the alien autopsy film; the ones with the guts I recognize from cleaning fish. Not that photo of the little kid in the grey alien mask that was anonymously sent to Whitley Streiber. I mean something that isn’t obvious bullshit. Show me that.

Show me something. But don’t parade channelers and remote viewers and ludicrous cult leaders like Rael and blurry messages from Grey Dudes, and bad science fiction scenes — farcical material from people who ask us for more faith than Billy Graham does…Turn away from the silly, as a reflex. Eliminate it out of hand. Get serious.

You want to do some serious research? Recently, Sightings on the Radio’s Web site had a wonderful UFO report from a Canadian naval officer. During the Korean War, the guy — and some others on his naval ship — saw a flying saucer up pretty damn close, hovering nearby. He’s just coming out with the story now. He gives definite information about himself. So how about finding this guy, how about confirming his military rank and record, how about confirming he was on that ship, how about tracking down the other witnesses, how about getting affidavits from a group of strongly reputable military men who saw something alien up close? Or how about really doggedly pursuing that tantalizing 1942 Battle of L.A. case? Then you might have something.

The point is, those cases, the ones with real evidence to them, are out there. But just reporting them as hearsay doesn’t make it. We’re told about the “Russian Roswell” at “Gj coordinates — between 42 degrees 10 minutes-42 degrees 2 minutes of northern latitude, and between 70 degrees 40 minutes-79 degrees 42 minutes of east longitude. Kirghizia, to the east of lake Isyk-Kul, 100 km. exact on east from Przehalks town…” Those are pretty exact coordinates. How about if one of those Interested millionaires giving grants to ufological investigators sends an expedition there, to that exact spot, where supposedly physical evidence resides, instead of just talking about it?

How about if we get serious?

So, so asinine.

Most people who approach a channeler for answers or who are first learning to channel hold some or all of the following beliefs:

1.) The channeler is a conduit through which the information comes. As such, he or she brings nothing to the party, so to speak, but instead can be thought of as a glorified spiritual radio tuning into the information being broadcast by the entities being channeled.

2.)The entities being channeled, by virtue of either being dead (deceased, departed from physical life) or by virtue of never having been in a physical body, are perfected beings who have only the highest thoughts and intentions toward we lowly and inadequate human beings.

3.)The information coming through is, therefore, always 100% accurate and always comes from a high and loving source.

4.) Anything that comes through a channeler, therefore, is never to be questioned, but instead should be accepted and followed verbatim.

5.) Trance channels or channels who are not conscious of their channeling are more accurate than conscious channels.

NONE OF THESE ARE TRUE!

Unfortunately, many people continue to hold these beliefs even after consulting a channeler, or (worse yet) even after becoming a channeler themselves. It is my belief that this is not a good thing. What often results is that the person consulting a channeler suspends all judgment and rational thought along with their disbelief, often, then, ending up with more of a mess than they had before they consulted the channeler.

@John Shirley

I don’t know if you saw my other post in the other thread, but I’ll answer this post anyway.

Discernment is key, and you will be hard pressed to find people here that are not critical of the sources, as we have all had our share of disinformation and ridicule.

I do not know how many times I have heard the claim that people who believe in channelings are just gullible fools, who will believe anything being said, and the myths that you post are perfectly valid, but honestly who believes in any channelings without question? You may think that is the case, but I for one can tell you otherwise.

>>”Unfortunately, many people continue to hold these beliefs even after consulting a channeler, or (worse yet) even after becoming a channeler themselves. It is my belief that this is not a good thing. What often results is that the person consulting a channeler suspends all judgment and rational thought along with their disbelief, often, then, ending up with more of a mess than they had before they consulted the channeler.”

Ha ha, well it is your choice to think that people suspend all rational thought, but are you saying what I think you are saying: these messages are not believable if one has rational thought? I did believe that for the first 32 years of my life, but it sounds to me like you have made your mind up and you are saying that all channelers are frauds. That is your choice! All I can say is do your own research and only trust your own gut feeling, and if that tells you that these galactic messages are completely out there, then so it is – do not let anyone tell you otherwise.

In Light & Peace

@draghci:

Yes, I totally agree with you. I really like David Icke, but he thinks that Obama is just another version of Bush – a puppet of the powers behind the curtains, and to a large extent that is true. However, David is unable to see that Obama can be the change that is needed, because that is not how the system has worked so far, but the system is falling apart before our eyes.

As I see it Obama is playing chess with the Illuminati, and he is always thinking 3 steps further ahead compared to them

@John Shirley

>>” The entities being channeled, by virtue of either being dead (deceased, departed from physical life) or by virtue of never having been in a physical body, are perfected beings who have only the highest thoughts and intentions…”

It all depends on which dimension your source is at – if it is 4th dimensional I would not trust a single thing being said. If it is 5th dimensional or above, then I start listening, but how does one know for sure – you cannot, and that is exactly why experimenting with e.g. an Ouija board is not recommended for the novice.

If you get in contact with a 4th dimensional spirit that thrives on negative emotions, or gets a kick out of teasing you, I’ll bet you that it is going to do everything possible to scare the living daylights out of you.

Maybe it will start by telling you something that only a few of you know to gain your trust, and then it will go on and tell which one of you will die the next weekend. Now isn’t that fun!

But this does not mean that every channeler is getting misinformation, but it does mean that discernment is key both as a channeler and as a receiver of channeled information.

In Light & Peace

@John Shirley:

>>“If it’s the Psychic Network why do they need a phone number?”

Because he does not understand how psychics work – they cannot tune into 6 billion people at once. I can see the humor in that quote however misunderstood it is, but what does it have to do with this site?

If you don’t believe in channeled information, then this is not a site for you. May I suggest http://www.cnn.com if you want the really big lies They will tell you that CO2 is the cause of global warming (it is an effect of an increase in temperature – not the cause), and that fluoride is great in your water, and that terrorists are lurking at ever corner, and that Al-Qaeda exists, and that H1N1 is going to kill us all if you do not hurry and get vaccinated (of course they will not mention that some of the vaccines will be tainted with live H1N1).

No offence, but I prefer not being lied that much to, but it is your choice. Wait until the end of the year – if nothing out of the ordinary has occurred then come back to this site for a good laugh.

As I said there is misinformation in some of these channeled messages, but not listening to them for that reason is like refusing to talk to people, because some of them may lie to you.

In Light & Peace

I don’t know what to think of DIANE, it seems to talk like a human being. i didn’t really feel much from the message. As for Obama, some people believe he is destroying America for the Elitists’ plans, while others, like DIANE, believe he is a good man, playing this chess game with his masters, where in the end he’ll get check mate on all of them. I don’t believe this will happen. when you’re in satan’s chair you evenutally morph into the devil himself.
From this account I feel I should sit back and watch what Obama does. I am assuming he will destroy America whilst some keep this hope alive that he’s really a good guy. Yes, he’s a really nice, great guy but he’s finishing the job for the Illuminati, then they’ll eliminate him.

JOHN SHIRLEY, who had a great long rant earlier, I can agree with the frustation of UFOLOGY. one day i’m a believer, the next i think its all crap. I see youtube videos of people capturing objects in the sky on their shaky pieces of film coverage, none of the footage is ever critiqued and analysed which leaves the viewer to decide what it could be. It could just be a black ops UFO project and there the story ends.

As for Billy Meier, I don’t know what to think about him being this prophet Immanuel, reincarnated through the centuries. He’s a real character, I think he’s genuine, I can’t prove the contacts he’s had over the years. I think Semjase is a lovely spirited woman, the others seem dull, boring, scientific types, here just to do a mission of some sort. I don’t entirely agree with what the Pleiadians have said, perhaps I’m smart enough to see their points of view for planet earth. If I was ever taken to their home planet, i would feel home-sick, although a great experience.
I’ll never truly believe any of it unless I have a personal experience with pleiadians or whoever else is out there.

Hello, Blossom Goodchild here. I have a conversation that I had with my friends up there. Let me post it here.
————————————————-
B: How are you today?

GFL: We are fine. We are not fine. You must become one. You must become many. You must learn to “JUMP.” You have many great feathers in your Eskimo hut, such as a Pizza Hut.

B: I don’t understand, so many riddles. I suppose that all is well, then.

GFL: We come to take you home. Your home is going to glow bright green at noon and we will show up on the White House lawn and greet Lord Obama-Ashkana on September 17, 2009.

B: Um, it is September 27! Oh well, even though I don’t understand how it is possible, and even though it defies all logic and common sense, I will listen to you.

GFL: Oh, we meant to say, “January 21, 2010.” We wish to commend Master Obama-Ashkana for a job well done. We will teach him to be a love man. His seed will fertilize our home worlds.

B: ALRIGHT!! I am so happy! I can feel the energy as I typed those words. You seemed to get really excited when you talk about Obama’s “seed.”

GFL: Yes, we love “seed.” You must learn about PENGUINS. They are a sign. As a PENGUIN is a bird that is not able to fly, so is your race. We must sign off for now. Our energy is exhausted.

B: Until next time,

Namaste.
————————————————

Thank GOD, I know now that it is DONE !

The last thing we need is a balance between good and evil.
There can be no compromise on principles.
Unless a person is born again he cannot enter the Kingdom.
Take up your cross and follow me.
The harvest is ripe, the time has come.

The Faithful Witness

John Shirley: If you are so amused by all the goings-on, then why don’t you sit in the front row, suspend any further judgement, listen and learn!

He who laughs last laughs the hardest. I find it quite interesting that what I read first here, shows up later on the cnn website.